Translate

17 July 2010

Other Views on BP Capping Well in July 2010 -back-out-logic -editorial

If you want to plug the leak in the well below the top of the well, once you get the "relief" wells drilled
well then, you cap the well so the mud and cement flows out the breaks in the well below the surface....-you had to do it anyway rational for the latest BP BS.(also you now know pressure level which when exceed means the middle-kill is closing the leaks...& all it takes is a v-shaped "roof'" adjacent and above the leak and and the oil can migrate elsewhere to emerge from the sea bed miles away...)

...BP stock recovers (it has a bit) when BPUSgov lie there is no oil flowing out of the well (i.e. not out the capped top a diversion lie) while asserting there is no apparent leak in the well even though the pressure does not rise to the expected level...this benefits British pensioners a bit whose pensions depend on BP stock price...before some other company buys out BP, in effect killing off the "corporate person" BP now is...how do the liabilities transfer? Immense liabilities if not brushed under the rug as it seems will be the case...

When now, the U.S. governement seems to be calling the shots (Secretary of Energy Chu) does that then somehow absolve BP of responsibility hereon since they are not calling the shots?

Our Government, oh what the heck lets say Obama, seem to be treating BP rather favorably considering
they effectively destroyed most, if not all of our southern coast, for some time if not forever..because they are greedy stupid bastard criminals.

Reminder: Oil Companies should not drill where they do not know how to and where in fact it may be impossible to drill safely at all, ---a mile deep under water into huge gas oil reserves tenuously capped with a layer of salt...GOM. There is no national security concern that should allow drilling which endangers national security and already has destroyed portions of the country - not "threatened to." The U.S. Government is now merely a corporate pawn felon ongoing until it is replaced...and still the sheeple chew their cud. Policy based on "threats" anyone see a problem with that?